Recently a couple of New Brunswick news websites posted
articles about panhandling in two of the province’s cities. The public posted widely in the comments
section of one of these sites. I have
been persuaded, but likely not in the way some of the posters intended. The posters convinced me that being Social
Justice Christians is not enough. We
must also be Compassionate Merciful Christians.
Business organizations in a pair of New Brunswick cities
have been raising the issue of panhandling.
They are encouraging people to not give to panhandlers in an effort to
prevent “aggressive” panhandlers from bothering people. I disagree with most of what they said, but I
respect that they put their names behind the statements. Debate can therefore flourish. (You can read
the news articles here
and here.)[1]
Many people agree with the stance taken by the organizations. This agreement doesn’t concern me too
much. Debate is good and necessary when
creating public policy and I would be surprised if I am right 100% of the
time. It is good to have someone around
willing to say to me, “Easy big fella.
Let’s scale that back a bit.” What
does concern me is when people call panhandlers (or any other marginalized
group) bums and assume they are lazy. Neither
of the organizations said these things.
I commend their respectfulness.
Some of the (anonymous) public commentators did use this language,
though.
But what about those few times when the statements are
right? For the sake of a good argument,
let’s set the facts aside. We will pretend
that the statement “panhandlers are lazy” is universally and always correct.
In this thought experiment, what are we to do? Let’s pretend that all panhandlers are bums
and that panhandling exists only as a result of laziness. If panhandlers are lazy bums, is it right for
people to call them that?
As a Christian, I believe in forgiveness. Being forgiving is not touchy-feely. Being forgiving is hard. Being forgiving is not natural to us. Being forgiving takes effort. Being forgiving sets aside the moral high
ground that comes with being right.
Being forgiving kind of sucks. Forgiveness
is a high, if irritating, calling that I, along with all other Christians, am obliged
to keep.[2]
For Christians, forgiveness should be the response when
we hear, “Hey, you got any change?” In
this way, we can serve as an example that we hope the rest of society will
imitate. What does being forgiving mean
in this context? I don’t know the entire
answer, but it will likely include not judging the person from afar, not
ignoring pleas for help, and forgiving over and over and over and over again. It definitely does not include the phrase
“lazy bum.”
I want to turn to a few scripture passages. They will be useful to recall when we finish
this experiment. All three suggest what
I think is a normative course for Jesus’ followers in the real world.
The first comes from the Gospel of John. The Pharisees bring a woman caught in
adultery to Jesus. The Law says that the
penalty for adultery is death. Jesus
says to go ahead and stone her, assuming that the man who hasn’t sinned throws the
first rock. The Pharisees slink away. The guilty woman stands alone with the man
who hasn’t sinned, the man who can throw the first rock, the man who refuses to
do so. The man, Jesus, is blunt. “I don’t condemn you,” he says. “Go and sin no more.”[3]
The second passage comes from the Gospel of Matthew. Peter asks Jesus how many times he has to
forgive someone. Jesus says 7x70
times. This doesn’t mean picking up a
rock and being ready for Sin #491. Four-hundred-and-ninety
is a big and specific number. Keeping
that tally would be onerous. My guess is
that Jesus was symbolically saying, “Forgive always.”[4]
The final passage comes from 2 Thessalonians. Paul makes a simple statement: Those
unwilling to work will not get to eat (NLT). Does this justify ignoring panhandlers or
calling them names? Unlikely. Paul’s statement is part of a lesson he is
teaching. First, he makes a rule that he
applies to himself and his partners.
Second, he tells others to imitate his rule. Third, he tells others to work instead of being
nosey. Paul never says, “Ignore people
who ask for help.” Nor does anything he
says negate Jesus’ repeated calls to be a forgiving people. Paul’s endorsement of hard work does not
endorse responding to “Hey buddy, got a quarter?” with loathing and condemnation. He concludes his lesson by telling his
readers not to treat those unwilling to work as enemies.[5]
Let’s step back into the real world, carrying these
lessons with us. We are back to the
place where we actually live and I am actually a Christian. Back to the place to which scripture actually
speaks. Back to the place where
panhandling is a symptom of homelessness, lack of education, disability or
other health issues, mental illness, and addiction. Back to here and now.[6]
The real world requires clarity, so I will be clear. I want social justice to happen and I want it
to happen right now.
Justice demands that the community see panhandling as a
problem, but as a problem for the panhandlers instead of for people of whom
panhandlers ask for change. To those who
want justice, panhandling screams the need to address housing, education,
health-care, addiction, and mental-health issues. With justice, panhandling will not be as much
of a problem.
I’m not naive. I
know that panhandling will still exist to some degree alongside a just way of
addressing panhandling. At that point –
and only that point – we can go ahead and suggest that its cause is personal fault. How do we respond to the few that are lazy,
at least as Christians? We start by not
condemning. We then continue to not
condemn over and over and over again. We
conclude, not by ignoring requests for a quarter, but instead by serving and
always serving, until repentance happens.
That is what the sister or brother Paul talks about in 2 Thessalonians
would do and that is how we are supposed to behave.
Micah 6:8 tells us what God expects of those who claim to
follow him. Be just, be merciful, and be
humble. Social justice is trendy right
now, but it only meets a third of God’s expectation. It is not enough to be Social Justice
Christians. We need to be Merciful Compassionate
Christians as well.
Merciful Compassionate Christians must demand more than
justice. Merciful Compassionate
Christians must also explain the sinfulness in statements like, “Sod off, you
lazy bum.” Then we need to show an
alternative approach.
[1]Reading
about panhandling is what got me to thinking about being a Merciful
Compassionate Christian, I don’t want to present myself as an expert on
panhandling. For an excellent commentary
about how to address panhandling, please see this article published on their website by the Fredericton organization
Community Action Group on Homelessness.
[2] Especially if I want God to forgive me.
[3] The entire account, without my paraphrase, is here.
[4] The account is here.
[5] The entirety of what Paul wrote on the subject is in 2Thessalonians 3:6-15. To be fair, I haven’t seen anyone use what I’ll call the No Work, No Eat, It’s In the Bible argument relative to the panhandling debate going on in New Brunswick right now. I have seen it used in similar contexts, so I expect that it is fair to bring up now.
[6] The article mentioned above provides this list. I can’t recommend the article enough. It specifically deals with panhandling, outlining why deterrents to panhandling rarely work and suggesting why housing first is a viable way to address panhandling.
[2] Especially if I want God to forgive me.
[3] The entire account, without my paraphrase, is here.
[4] The account is here.
[5] The entirety of what Paul wrote on the subject is in 2Thessalonians 3:6-15. To be fair, I haven’t seen anyone use what I’ll call the No Work, No Eat, It’s In the Bible argument relative to the panhandling debate going on in New Brunswick right now. I have seen it used in similar contexts, so I expect that it is fair to bring up now.
[6] The article mentioned above provides this list. I can’t recommend the article enough. It specifically deals with panhandling, outlining why deterrents to panhandling rarely work and suggesting why housing first is a viable way to address panhandling.
This post originally appeared on my former blog ajdickinson.blogspot.ca. The date stamp is for the date of the original posting.
No comments:
Post a Comment